<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbidden Planet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-8969</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-8969</guid>
		<description>Question to James Cameron in Time Magazine (15 Mar 2010, p. 4):

"Is Avatar a Native American story?"

Answer:  "Not exclusively.  I think Americans locate the story there most quickly.  But Avatar's now the No. 1 movie in Brazil, and Brazil has a lot of issues with the displacement of indigenous populations and deforestation.  There's a tribe in India that is getting pushed off its sacred mountain for a bauxite mine.  The film is hugely popular in China and people there are getting displaced by the govenment to build dams.  So people are relating to it from all these different perspectives."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question to James Cameron in Time Magazine (15 Mar 2010, p. 4):</p>
<p>&#8220;Is Avatar a Native American story?&#8221;</p>
<p>Answer:  &#8220;Not exclusively.  I think Americans locate the story there most quickly.  But Avatar&#8217;s now the No. 1 movie in Brazil, and Brazil has a lot of issues with the displacement of indigenous populations and deforestation.  There&#8217;s a tribe in India that is getting pushed off its sacred mountain for a bauxite mine.  The film is hugely popular in China and people there are getting displaced by the govenment to build dams.  So people are relating to it from all these different perspectives.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-8336</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-8336</guid>
		<description>Richard Corliss commenting on Avatars chances for a Best Picture Oscar (Time Magazine 15 Feb 2010, p. 61):

" . . . Hollywood may also prefere a film that celebrates America's fighting men (The Hurt Locker) to one that casts many U.S. troops as criminal invaders. . . ."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Corliss commenting on Avatars chances for a Best Picture Oscar (Time Magazine 15 Feb 2010, p. 61):</p>
<p>&#8221; . . . Hollywood may also prefere a film that celebrates America&#8217;s fighting men (The Hurt Locker) to one that casts many U.S. troops as criminal invaders. . . .&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-8113</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-8113</guid>
		<description>The following interesting comment was made in Time Magazine (February 8th, 2010) by Richard Corliss:

". . . Audiences are just beguiled by Pandora's humanish tribe, the Na'vi--the lean, 10-ft-till, blue striped people with yellow eyes.  They are what humans might have been if they had evolved in harmony with, not in opposition to, the Edenic environment that gave them birth."

And another important point that is worth making came from the same article.  It has to do with have the strong female character:

" . . . Avatar's closest kin among current hits may be The Blind Side, the female-skewing sports film.  Both tell stories of strong women who find rootless young men and give them a purpose around which they build their lives."

But Corliss gets a little carried away in the conclusion when he opines:

" . . . Avatar (is) a throwback to ancient movie days, when films about men and women seduced the mass audience.  And because it works spendidly as spectacle and love story.  Cameron's picture is worthy of comparison to the great old epics.  The world beater is also a heartbreaker, if you just open your eyes."

For me the movie works as spectacle, but not as love story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following interesting comment was made in Time Magazine (February 8th, 2010) by Richard Corliss:</p>
<p>&#8220;. . . Audiences are just beguiled by Pandora&#8217;s humanish tribe, the Na&#8217;vi&#8211;the lean, 10-ft-till, blue striped people with yellow eyes.  They are what humans might have been if they had evolved in harmony with, not in opposition to, the Edenic environment that gave them birth.&#8221;</p>
<p>And another important point that is worth making came from the same article.  It has to do with have the strong female character:</p>
<p>&#8221; . . . Avatar&#8217;s closest kin among current hits may be The Blind Side, the female-skewing sports film.  Both tell stories of strong women who find rootless young men and give them a purpose around which they build their lives.&#8221;</p>
<p>But Corliss gets a little carried away in the conclusion when he opines:</p>
<p>&#8221; . . . Avatar (is) a throwback to ancient movie days, when films about men and women seduced the mass audience.  And because it works spendidly as spectacle and love story.  Cameron&#8217;s picture is worthy of comparison to the great old epics.  The world beater is also a heartbreaker, if you just open your eyes.&#8221;</p>
<p>For me the movie works as spectacle, but not as love story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-7720</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-7720</guid>
		<description>According to Trini Tran of the AP (SLTrib Jan 20, 2010):

"China is pulling the 2D version of "Avatar" from screens across the country amid claims the plot mirrors forced land evictions in the country.  Authorities insist that the decision was a commercial one, . . .  Critics claim the firm's plot parallels the removal of millions of residents to make way for property developers. . . ."

"There is sensitivity to the movie's plot, which revolves around the forced evictions of the alien Na'vi race by humans -- a story line that some have said draws unflattering comparisons to China's own, often brutal removal of millions of residents to make way for property developers."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Trini Tran of the AP (SLTrib Jan 20, 2010):</p>
<p>&#8220;China is pulling the 2D version of &#8220;Avatar&#8221; from screens across the country amid claims the plot mirrors forced land evictions in the country.  Authorities insist that the decision was a commercial one, . . .  Critics claim the firm&#8217;s plot parallels the removal of millions of residents to make way for property developers. . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;There is sensitivity to the movie&#8217;s plot, which revolves around the forced evictions of the alien Na&#8217;vi race by humans &#8212; a story line that some have said draws unflattering comparisons to China&#8217;s own, often brutal removal of millions of residents to make way for property developers.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-7630</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-7630</guid>
		<description>According to Alessandra Rizzo of the AP in SLTrib (Jan 12, 2010):

"The Vatican newspaper and radio station have called the film "Avatar" simplistic, and criticized it for flirting with modern doctrines that promote the worship of nature as a substitute for religion.

L'Osservatoire Romano said the film "gets bogged down by a spiritualism linked to the worship of nature.  Similarly, Vatican Radio said it "cleverly winks at all those pseudo-doctrines that turn ecology into the religion of the millennium."

"Nature is no longer a creation to defend, but a divinity to worship," the radio said.

Vatican spokesman the Rev. Federico Lombardi said that while the movie reviews are just that -- film criticism, with no theological weight -- they do reflect Pope Benedict XVI's views on the dangers of turning nature into a "new divinity."

In a recent World Day of Peace, the pontiff warned against any notions that equate human person and other living things.  He said such notions "open the way to a new pantheism tinged with neo-paganism, which would see the source of man's salvation in nature alone."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Alessandra Rizzo of the AP in SLTrib (Jan 12, 2010):</p>
<p>&#8220;The Vatican newspaper and radio station have called the film &#8220;Avatar&#8221; simplistic, and criticized it for flirting with modern doctrines that promote the worship of nature as a substitute for religion.</p>
<p>L&#8217;Osservatoire Romano said the film &#8220;gets bogged down by a spiritualism linked to the worship of nature.  Similarly, Vatican Radio said it &#8220;cleverly winks at all those pseudo-doctrines that turn ecology into the religion of the millennium.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Nature is no longer a creation to defend, but a divinity to worship,&#8221; the radio said.</p>
<p>Vatican spokesman the Rev. Federico Lombardi said that while the movie reviews are just that &#8212; film criticism, with no theological weight &#8212; they do reflect Pope Benedict XVI&#8217;s views on the dangers of turning nature into a &#8220;new divinity.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a recent World Day of Peace, the pontiff warned against any notions that equate human person and other living things.  He said such notions &#8220;open the way to a new pantheism tinged with neo-paganism, which would see the source of man&#8217;s salvation in nature alone.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-7520</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-7520</guid>
		<description>Another on-line comment referred to it as an ode to pantheism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another on-line comment referred to it as an ode to pantheism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-7518</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-7518</guid>
		<description>Overall, I enjoyed the movie.  The special effects:  A.  The story/plot line:  C.  About a month ago I asked my 20-year-old son if he was going to see it and his reply, "it's just a science fiction version of Dances with Wolves".  I happened to like Dances with Wolves, so his bit of a put down didn't deter me.  A good friend wanted to see it in 3-D at the Imax, but acquiesed and we saw it in 3-D, no Imax.  It was also too long (why are so many recent movies moving to 2-1/2 hours or more, vs. the more traditional 2 hours or less?).  Oh well, I digress.

I enjoyed the story, but at times was a bit confused.  This is probably due in fact that I apparently have a limited imagination.  I can honestly say that I have never really grasped the whole "Star Trek/Star Wars/Lord of the Rings" genre.  In fact, I never even got Harry Potter.  I remember taking my kids and nieces and nephews to the first Harry Potter that came out and I said to my then about 13-year-old daughter that I just didn't get this whole Harry Potter thing.  Her comment?  "Well, that's interesting since this book is read by millions of children, with the average age of about 10".  LOL, do you think she was trying to tell me something?  Again, I digress.

The special effects were wonderful.  I was confused a bit with the Sigourney Weaver character.  A bitch as a human, but a great friend to the people?  I thought the contrast in her character was a bit too flawed.  I did enjoy her passion, however, and by the end of the movie I cared about her.  Jake Skully, on the other hand, had a similar personality whether human or one of the people.  But even then, I thought it strange that when his girlfriend saved him near the end of the movie, by giving him the oxygen which he needed to stay alive, he was as a human ("I see you") and she one of the people.

How have I survived in an engineering organization where I am employed, where people (engineers for the most part) obviously think outside the box, and really get into this stuff?   I think I'll stick with a good love story (no, not chick flick).  A little more realistic and pleasing to the palate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, I enjoyed the movie.  The special effects:  A.  The story/plot line:  C.  About a month ago I asked my 20-year-old son if he was going to see it and his reply, &#8220;it&#8217;s just a science fiction version of Dances with Wolves&#8221;.  I happened to like Dances with Wolves, so his bit of a put down didn&#8217;t deter me.  A good friend wanted to see it in 3-D at the Imax, but acquiesed and we saw it in 3-D, no Imax.  It was also too long (why are so many recent movies moving to 2-1/2 hours or more, vs. the more traditional 2 hours or less?).  Oh well, I digress.</p>
<p>I enjoyed the story, but at times was a bit confused.  This is probably due in fact that I apparently have a limited imagination.  I can honestly say that I have never really grasped the whole &#8220;Star Trek/Star Wars/Lord of the Rings&#8221; genre.  In fact, I never even got Harry Potter.  I remember taking my kids and nieces and nephews to the first Harry Potter that came out and I said to my then about 13-year-old daughter that I just didn&#8217;t get this whole Harry Potter thing.  Her comment?  &#8220;Well, that&#8217;s interesting since this book is read by millions of children, with the average age of about 10&#8243;.  LOL, do you think she was trying to tell me something?  Again, I digress.</p>
<p>The special effects were wonderful.  I was confused a bit with the Sigourney Weaver character.  A bitch as a human, but a great friend to the people?  I thought the contrast in her character was a bit too flawed.  I did enjoy her passion, however, and by the end of the movie I cared about her.  Jake Skully, on the other hand, had a similar personality whether human or one of the people.  But even then, I thought it strange that when his girlfriend saved him near the end of the movie, by giving him the oxygen which he needed to stay alive, he was as a human (&#8221;I see you&#8221;) and she one of the people.</p>
<p>How have I survived in an engineering organization where I am employed, where people (engineers for the most part) obviously think outside the box, and really get into this stuff?   I think I&#8217;ll stick with a good love story (no, not chick flick).  A little more realistic and pleasing to the palate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-7504</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-7504</guid>
		<description>"Copernicus," an astrophysicist writing on aintitcool.com wrote the following:

"The dream of interstellar travel will only become a reality far beyound our lifetimes.  But I love the fact that today I can be deeply immersed in not just a plausible, but a compelling alien world just by putting on a pair of 3D glasses and visiting my local theater.  Even if I have to drive 100 miles to see it in IMAX, that is nothing compared to interstellar distances!  And I love that there is a filmmaker that pays more than lip service to the science in his films, stimulating discussion and thought about distant worlds among geeks everywhere.  I was inspired to do astronomy after seeing STAR WARS as a kid.  I'm willing to bet that a fair fraction of tomorrow's astronomers will have decided to devote their life to the discovery of new worlds because of AVATAR."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Copernicus,&#8221; an astrophysicist writing on aintitcool.com wrote the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;The dream of interstellar travel will only become a reality far beyound our lifetimes.  But I love the fact that today I can be deeply immersed in not just a plausible, but a compelling alien world just by putting on a pair of 3D glasses and visiting my local theater.  Even if I have to drive 100 miles to see it in IMAX, that is nothing compared to interstellar distances!  And I love that there is a filmmaker that pays more than lip service to the science in his films, stimulating discussion and thought about distant worlds among geeks everywhere.  I was inspired to do astronomy after seeing STAR WARS as a kid.  I&#8217;m willing to bet that a fair fraction of tomorrow&#8217;s astronomers will have decided to devote their life to the discovery of new worlds because of AVATAR.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret Berger</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-7483</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-7483</guid>
		<description>Uhmmm, diurnal cycles of heavy mist saturating the highly fractured rock followed by heavy runoff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhmmm, diurnal cycles of heavy mist saturating the highly fractured rock followed by heavy runoff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogerhansen.org/2010/01/forbidden-planet/#comment-7478</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerhansen.org/?p=649#comment-7478</guid>
		<description>Bret, how about the ridiculous water falls coming from the floating mountains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bret, how about the ridiculous water falls coming from the floating mountains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
